AEP’s WV Companies Want Even Higher Rates in Coal Bond Bailout

The Charleston Daily Mail’s Jared Hunt has a story today on the final coal bond bailout plan presented by Ohio company AEP’s WV subsidiaries to the WV PSC.  The total amount of the bailout is now $410 million, up from the $350 million they told the Legislature it would cost last February and up from $391.5 million that they told the PSC at the beginning of the current case.  As Keryn and I predicted, AEP has used the coal bailout gift given to it by the Legislature to keep jacking up their customers electric rates.  We also learn later in Hunt’s story that the actual current debt owed on AEP’s big 2008 coal mistake is only $311.9 million, $103 million less that what AEP now wants WV customers to pay interest on in the new bailout plan.

Hunt states the facts of the situation, but misses the real financial point.

With historically low rates in the bond market right now, the companies feel it’s a better way to pay off the costs than traditional bank financing.

The joint filing said the companies expect to sell 10-year bonds at an average market rate of 1.77 percent. By comparison, if the companies tried to get capital loans from a bank, they could expect to pay an interest rate of 8.84 percent.

The point is that right now, AEP is paying that 8.84 percent interest.  If the PSC approves the coal bailout, AEP’s WV customers will be paying the 1.77 percent interest.  Why not just raise rates and pay off the full amount of what rate payers owe all at once?  Because AEP and the WV PSC don’t want to face the wrath of AEP rate payers for sticking them with the real costs of the failed policies of AEP and the PSC which have tied WV electric rates to the vagaries of the coal market.

Note the weaseling by the AEP PR person on the rate impact of the bailout:

Because of that wide difference in interest costs, Appalachian Power spokeswoman Jeri Matheney said a bond sale would produce significant savings over the next decade.

“In the long term, over the life of the bonds, we expect securitization will save customers about $146 million,” Matheney said.

Under the bond proposal filed Wednesday, the average residential customer would pay a $0.309 per kilowatt-hour charge, referred to as the Consumer Rate Relief Charge. Revenue from that charge would be applied to the bond payments.

But Matheney said that doesn’t mean customers will pay higher rates. She said that charge would simply replace some of the current fuel costs customers are already paying.

“We believe that the current ENEC charge is enough to cover the Consumer Rate Relief Charge; that’s why there would be no change in rates,” she said.

Note that neither Hunt nor Matheney tells you where this magical $146 million savings actually comes from.  Is it the difference between the interest rates that AEP is now paying and what WV rate payers would be saddled with?  Is it the cost of coal bailout bond costs compared with the current ENEC charges for the AEP coal mistake?  We don’t know.  It’s just a magical number that AEP put out there.  Kind of like the $350 million they used in their snowjob on the Legislature earlier in the year.

Matheney’s gobbledygook assessment of rate impacts compares apples to oranges, but we don’t even know what apples and what oranges she is using.

Back in February, Daily Mail business reporter George Hohmann made all these points in an excellent story about the Legislative debate (or lack of it) on the coal bond bailout bill.

As I noted in an earlier post, if AEP’s plan goes through the PSC, the PSC will join AEP and almost all of WV’s legislators in giving APCo and Wheeling Power customers a great big screwing.  That’s blunt language, but there really is no other way to describe it.  Instead of calling its proposed coal bailout bond charge the “Consumer Rate Relief Charge,” AEP should more accurately call it the Interest Cost Transfer to Consumers Charge.

One thought on “AEP’s WV Companies Want Even Higher Rates in Coal Bond Bailout

  1. The least the PSC could do is insist that ApCo call a spade a spade. The Consumer Debt Bond charges will consist of:

    $311,872,391 of unrecovered ENEC balance (old fuel debt)
    $26,022,676 in deferred bonus coal payments
    $1,925,000 in 2010 “Transmission Agreement” phase in (what the heck is this??)
    $22,695,871 in old Century Aluminum “special rate” deferrals
    $4,879,622 in other “special rate” deferrals for other industrial customers
    $10,837,893 in deferred costs of getting Dresden online
    AND $36,965,878 in “carrying costs” (Interest)

    Just as we predicted, AEP is using the Consumer Debt Bonds to clear all old deferrals off its books. Whenever you hear that a power company has “deferred” a rate amount, that simply means they’ve set it aside to collect from you later, with interest. I thought all the Century stuff was going to be handled in the Century case, but here they are trying to hide it in the Consumer Debt Bonds. And, like the world’s worst credit card junkie, AEP is going to turn right around and “defer” storm repair costs totaling millions. AEP is out of control, charging its expenses on a credit card that is the financial responsibility of consumers. Because this process is supposed to be complicated and confusing to consumers, AEP and the PSC will take full advantage to toss in a bunch of unrelated expenses with little scrutiny because it’s all going on the consumer credit card so it doesn’t matter how much it costs.

    Where does Matheney think the money to pay off the bonds is going to come from? Not from AEP! It’s going to come from consumers.

    Ludicrous! (BTW, can you add case no. 12-1188-E-PC in there somewhere, took me a few minutes to find the filing).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s