NERC and Reliability – Transmission Capacity Doesn’t Show Up in Latest Report

In May, NERC released its most recent evaluation of the North American bulk transmission/generation system’s reliability.  NERC reports steady progress.

Despite hysterical screaming by the electrical industry for the last two decades that we need more HV transmission lines to insure reliability, there isn’t even a mention of lack of capacity in NERC’s new report.  Power companies (and our poor deluded friend at the NYT, Matt Wald) are still pointing to the 2003 US/Canada blackout to justify building more power lines.

Of course, that is just silly, as reliability expert George Loehr demonstrated clearly in his 2008 testimony before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.  Loehr pointed out that cascading system failures are not caused by the inability to transfer power from one area to another, they are caused primarily by lack of standards for how operators respond to unusual events.

And here’s what NERC’s new report says:

Chapter 3 of this report discusses that protection system misoperations had the largest positive correlation with automatic transmission outage severity in 2012. The correlation is statistically significant: a pattern and underlying dependency exists between misoperations and transmission outage severity. On average, transmission events with misoperations were more impactful than transmission events without misoperations. They were also, in aggregate, the largest contributor to transmission severity. The relative risk of misoperations is the highest among all cause codes, excluding Weather and Unknown initiating causes. These facts indicate that a reduction of misoperations would lead to a great improvement in reliability.

Remember then-AEP CEO Mike Morris’s plan, stated at the 2005 Charleston Love Fest, to get PJM to use “reliability” for the Project Mountaineer smokescreen?  Pure bunk.

The people who really manage system reliability don’t even consider transmission capacity as being an issue of any kind.  Remember that the next time you hear a transmission project promoter claiming that his/her line is needed to prevent “blackouts.”

2 thoughts on “NERC and Reliability – Transmission Capacity Doesn’t Show Up in Latest Report

  1. You need transmission capacity to make their little markets work. You know, how one electron produced anywhere in the United States can be used anywhere else in the U.S., theoretically of course. So, pretty soon, we’ll be the United States of Socialized Electricity Prices, where we all pay the same amount, even when some of us bear more of the burden.

    • Keryn, you describe exactly the Canadian Wheat Board where farmers sell wheat for the same throughout the nation, regardless of transportation costs to the Canadian Wheat Board.

      The board attempts to buy wheat from farmers and elevators, sell to export markets, and cover its costs while maintaining one price for the entire nation.

      Consequently one “expert” called the messed up rail transportation system a “SCHMAZZLE”. This expert was attempting to sell the American grain company on mechandizing more Canadian wheat, but as he described the Canadian system it was more and more obvious how messed up the system was.

      With a socialized system, there is no incentive for the railroads to improve transmission or transportation efficiencies.

      I suspect the same problem would occur in America if we had a national transmission system for energy. No incentive for efficiency and more misoperations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s