NY Times Pushing New Transmission in the Hudson Valley

Well, here they go again.  Instead of pushing HV transmission in other parts of the US, like WV, the NY Times is now pushing projects in their own backyard.

Note the peculiarities of reporter Penelope Green’s story: exotic specialty farmers, references to the effects of ionizing radiation, and descriptions of NIMBY objections.  What you won’t find is any detail about what lines will be built and why.  Nothing about the specifics of the project and the NY ISO process that brought it to the drawing board.  No details about the company, Transco, that is supposed to build the new lines.

Oh, and there’s lots of the vague talk about reliability and “relieving congestion” but no specifics on NY ISO’s reasoning.

But this piece isn’t about the facts.  It is the usual propaganda designed to portray line opponents as quirky rural eccentrics and their quixotic attempts to stop a project that is already a done deal.  Where have we seen this before?  Yup, in just about every transmission project that has been proposed in the last decade.

So Ms. Green continues the NY Times’ clueless propaganda for HV transmission in the grand tradition of Matt Wald.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s